2013.17 | cookies | kiosks | 51 co’s | eBay | purchext

Picture of Product as Tender – Weetabix in the UK recently had an offer where consumers can obtain a free Weetabix On The Go in a retail store by merely showing the cashier an image of the product.  And I thought retailers had fun with regular old coupons.  While it’s kinda fun, it seems somewhat pointless.  Effectively it’s the same as telling clients just to ask for a free sample – and that’s what will happen in stores as we all know.

Google ‘Kiosks’ - Google has announced a managed public sessions feature for chromebooks.  Google envisions this as a simple way to enable chromebooks as public internet kiosks for stores to offer customers a way to purchase things online that may not be in stock at the store or other ‘kiosk-type’ solutions.   As a retail technology professional I find these sorts of announcements interesting because it seems a bit like looking for a reason to have a feature.  It’s been possible to lock down kiosk terminals, notebooks, tablets, and even regular old pcs with kiosk mode on browsers or with special software packages for some time.  While a chromebook is a bit cheaper than a full fledged notebook, this kiosk feature seems a marginal benefit.

stylitics-pan_11088

51 Companies – Business Insider has an incredibly exhaustive list of 51 Retail Innovators that is a must read list for retailers. I’ve covered a number of the companies using technology for retail, but this a great list to provide some inspiration.  Some of my favourites: fab (curation), hointer (using your mobile for catalog like shopping in a store), and stylitics (track your wardrobe – think fashion only pinterest with what you have, not just what you want).

eBay Pop-up Store – eBay is apparently moving into real world retail as a part of a partnership with Kate Spade.  Unofficially, a pop-up Kate Spade store in NYC will be outfitted with a large touch screen window, presumably to allow purchases of items in the store.  eBay wish to provide a platform to assist real world retail sites to meld with the online.

purchext2

Purchext – A new Canadian app shown at Disrupt NYC 2013 provides parents the chance to remotely validate purchases of their children for release of funds to their bank account.   Interesting idea that I could see grocers considering within their own systems to ensure that family’s keep their purchases in the chain!  So much for the party run to the grocery store on dad’s card.

 

2013.06 | No Omnichannel without Operations

All of my talks on Omnichannel with retailers drive me to try out every option I possibly can with my own transactions.

Last weekend I went to see Bharati in at the Sony Centre in Toronto. (I highly recommend the show by the way.  See it if you can!)  Being part of a busy family our weekend was packed with events, ride giving, lessons, and more.  I found myself getting ready to leave the house only about 2 hours before the show – this is definitely cutting it close.

images

While I was preparing to depart, I used all of the tools technology available to enable to get there on time.  Ticketmaster was kind enough to send me a reminder email about the event on Friday, so I was able to pull up that message and logging into my account, I printed my tickets.  Great omnichannel experience from Ticketmaster.   It costs too much for Ticketmaster, but it worked smoothly to the point where I didn’t even think about it.

I know the route to get to the theatre well, but always check the GPS routes for options.  I also had to think about parking. Everyone who goes to any urban location knows that parking is a changeable proposition.  Your favourite sites get built upon, closed up, or changed to some other use.

I visited the Sony Centre website to see what parking options were recommended, and I was intrigued by a link to something called Click and Park.

When I clicked that link, I saw a list of the events at the Sony Centre.  The system allows you to pre-pay for a parking spot during your event in a prime location right next to the theatre.  It makes a lot of sense to have a parking spot reserved in a convenient location.  The site indicates the process is as simple as three easy steps: choose your event, select your location and print your permit.  I read through the FAQs, and decided I definitely wanted to try this.  What a terrific idea to optimize a consumer experience and that of a parking lot operator.

I picked my event, validated the parking garage, and paid.  I quickly received my permit.  The pricing was high.  It was $22.42, including fees and the cost of parking.  I expected it to be more like $10 to $15 for a weekend, but I was willing to pay a bit of a premium for a good guaranteed spot, and well – this was for science.  I wanted to see how it worked.

The parking location is a garage I have frequented many times over the years, so I knew where I was going.    I was parking at the Brookfield Place garage.  I did a bit of checking as I know that there are multiple entrances.  One off  Wellington Street and one from Front Street at least.  Both were referred to on the Click and Park website so I figured I was ready to go.

CaptureI printed my permit, hopped in the car, and drove downtown, smug in the knowledge that I had parking covered.  As I approached the lot, I encountered my first problem.  I knew where I was going, but I like to double check any special instructions.  I pulled out my parking permit to double check the address and see what instructions were provided.

Unfortunately, the permit just says Brookfield Place.  Um, ok.  It also says 5pm to 6 am.  Wait, what? My show is on at 2 pm.  It says that right on there.  What does that mean?

Now, what if I didn’t know the address?  Would have been nice to have that on there, right?  Oh well, when I looked at the website, there was lots of friendly green and blue Web 2.0 branding.  I’m sure there will be some sort of signage to point me in the right direction.

I found the lot (after taking a detour – downtown construction being what it always is), and drove up to the kiosk.  I pulled out my form, ready to scan it at….at…..well, nothing.  There was no scanner.  There was no signage indicating what to do.  There was no logo from Click and Park telling me what to do.  There was a flashing light.  Thought that might be a scanner, but no.

Now, I like to think that I know what a scanner looks like.  If you glance through the blog, you will see I’ve worked with a few scanners.  I did not see a scanner, any signage, or any indication of anything other than pushing a button to get a ticket.  So….I pushed the button to get a ticket.

I drove through the garage.  No signage.  No indication that Click and Park exists at all.  I walked through the garage to the event, and saw no indication of Click and Park.

After my very enjoyable show, I thought perhaps I would see a scanner on the way out.  I drove up to the machine on the way out, and with a much more extensive search can assure you that there is no scanner on the exit system either.  I dutifully paid Brookfield Place $10 and departed.

Now, I can’t speak to how this Click and Park solution works in other places, and when I read through their site, I see all sorts of venues that love this system.  It may work well in those spots, but they are not going to get much in the way of business in Toronto without some changes.

If an omnichannel solution like this is going to work, it needs to work for everyone, virtually without them having to think.  I go well beyond the average person to seek out answers and make systems work, but this whole thing does not work at all.   I’m willing to take the $22 (well, maybe $32) hit for science, but I don’t think all of the potential clients of the Sony Centre will feel the same.

This is all about making it easy – not about making the user do the work.

Here’s what I hope the good team at Click and Park consider:

1.  FULL Process Transparency: Providing a process that goes beyond Click and Park getting money and the user printing a piece of paper is important.  That’s all that shows on the website.  It’s great graphic design, but it’s not going to help customers.  I understand that individual parking sites may vary on a process because different parking lots look different and have different systems.  In the interim, why not have specific images or video of the parking lots and how it works?  When you pick a parking lot on the site, it should show the user those images of the process (like scanning a barcode at a gate) so they can see what to expect.  If clients feel comfortable they will try the service and are more likely to use it successfully.  Once you have repeat customers; inertia can carry the solution more.

2.  Better directions: Writing Brookfield Place on a piece of paper is next to useless for the user driving in an urban centre.  Give an address at LEAST.  Better yet, provide some verbiage with details on parking – maybe even an image of the front entrance.   Why not provide a link to Google Maps with the garage on it so I can click an an email or text on my smart phone to get directions on my GPS?  There is no other Brookfield Place, but I’m still not sure if I went to the wrong place or what happened.

3.  Signage: Working with partners can be challenging, but there absolutely needs to be signage at a partner garage above or near the entrance.  If there’s no signage, I’m not sure I’m in the right place.  There should also be signage at entrance welcoming Click and Park guests with some simple instructions like: scan your barcode at the gate next to you.  On the gate itself, there should be some signage with the logo and simple instructions on how to use it.

4.  Recovery: If I as a user somehow manage to make an error in the process, like I forget to scan my card, there should be a way to recover.  The only recovery I saw was a message in my email saying no refunds.  Wrong message.  There should be signage at elevators coming back to the garage for Click and Park clients saying that if they missed scanning their codes, they can go to a certain place to get a new ticket, see an attendant or whatever works.   As a user, I now have a negative feeling of the Click and Park brand and about Brookfield Place.  If you make it easy, everybody wins.

5. Followup:  If I didn’t use the parking space, I should get a text or email asking me why I did not use it.  Click and Park has a list of tickets.  The Parking Lot has a list of tickets.  Mine isn’t on it. Why not ask me why it didn’t work out?   This is a missed opportunity to be sure the solution is working correctly and to gain feedback from users and the site staff.

I fully realize the effort required to complete the items I  have suggested here, but with absolute certainty I can say that this service may as well not exist if it doesn’t revisit its processes.   This is a terrific idea, and I hope it takes off.  For now it just feels like someone slapped a payments website up with this parking lot’s name on it.  It takes more than that for a solution like this to work.  It has to be completely aligned with the operation of the site.

I know I’m $22 smarter from my experience.  I fully expect the value on the knowledge Click and Park will be a much higher amount in the end if they don’t change things up.

2013.05 | Facebook Card | Sport Chek Lab | Traffic

facebook-card-balance-mobileFacebook Gift Card – Facebook recently announced a Facebook branded giftcard that can be used in the real world.  If you wish to gift someone at a Jamba Juice, Sephora, Target, or Olive Garden, one only has to select that recipient from your list of Facebook friends, identify them as a gift recipient and pay -much as you would do for any other gift card.  The gift recipient is mailed an actual physical Facebook branded card to use in stores like Target.  What makes this card unique and worthy of interest is the fact that the card can be reloaded with balances from multiple retailers.   Thinking about it this way, Facebook are providing another centralized payment mechanism.  That is, while in a card form now, Facebook is beginning  to act as a centralized clearing house for payments.  The Facebook card could be used as a future payment platform for online purchases, or via a mobile app like Starbucks does, or as a card as it is now.  Based on the card images it appears to be provided by some sort of partnership with Discover.  Looks like there is another potential partnership vying for space in the world’s already crowded wallet – mobile or otherwise. via psfk

skitchSport Chek Retail Lab – Looks like I’ll have to get on down to North Toronto to check out the latest in technology to get us to buy athletic equipment.  It seems that Sport Chek have put together lots of tech in a store deemed the Sport Chek Retail Lab to try it out.  I love the passion for the technology, and will definitely head over to visit.  While it sounds like it’s more of a lab scenario and therefore subject to different rules than a more traditional store, my only caution on projects like this is whether or not there is a need for all of the technology.

Things I would watch for in visiting this store:

  • is the technology really selling more merchandise than if we just put the items on a shelf in an attractive, engaging manner that is a part of the brand experience?
  • is the technology providing a truly unique customer experience?
  • is the technology assisting customers in a way that is not possible without it?
  • is the technology part of an overarching targeted customer experience, or are these just toys?
  • does the technology usage fit the retailers brand and customer demographic?

I love technology for its own sake, but not everyone does.  My experience dictates that if these technologies are to find their way into more than just a flagship or a demo store, they have to bring benefits to the retailer and the consumer.  It certainly appears that no option has been overlooked at this site!  Check out all of the tech!  I look forward to visiting and seeing the place myself!  via Artisan Complete

books_set2-1Book Recommendation: I just finished reading: Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (And What It Says About Us) by Tom Vanderbilt.

I enjoyed this book a great deal.  A few thoughts on why you might as well:

  • It will make you re-think your driving habits.  If you are like me, you’ve taken driving for granted and don’t think about it much.  You will think about it after you read the book.
  • There is so much around us that we don’t notice because we see it so much!
  • It helps to reset your perception of open mindedness.  I found the discussion of some renegade traffic planners in Europe removing street signs altogether and completely re-thinking roads and intersections to be an incredible example of how you can think completely outside of your assumptions.
  • Some fascinating ideas that are covered in the book: the rise of eating in the car – discussions of drive thrus – how we change our personality when we drive and why – how seeing eyes (real or artificial) can change your behaviour – a discussion of the psychology of queueing and how it holds true in traffic and in other areas – how we never get feedback on driving – how traffic design may not seem to be in your best interest but it is for the greater good – there is a ‘starbucks effect’ for traffic – that looking for the best parking spot at the mall is a waste of time – cars are parked 95% of the time – free parking has a high cost – comparing traffic to queuing at Disney – how rules affect behaviour like Pizza Hut in China
  • While he doesn’t cover Google’s self driving cars and their impact (the book was published in 2008), he did write about them for Wired this year.

I was surprised to see that it had so much information of relevance for my work.  I found myself in that first year university scenario where I was highlighting more of the book than not.  If you work in retail or retail technology, I guarantee there is something in this book for you! via 99 percent invisible

2012.38 | More Channels are Better

The Government of Ontario recently announced that it will be removing their network of 72 ServiceOntario Kiosks installed across the province.  The kiosks have sat unused for a number of months already as anyone who lives in Ontario can attest.  They are placed in many high traffic shopping areas across the province, and were strangely more noticeable these past few months without the usual line of 5-10 people around them.

Unfortunately it appears that the kiosks were targeted by criminals using skimming devices, and in reading between the lines, it appears that the government officials got very nervous about the potential for both payments fraud and for the security of the data of the citizens of Ontario.

As anyone who works in retail or banking can tell you, unfortunately there is always a certain level of fraud you can expect to see across any network with payments.  Pinpads are stolen or compromised from point of sale locations every day.  Attempts are made to skim the information of customers from ATMs.   So it goes.

While there is no way to eliminate fraud completely – electronic or otherwise, there are certainly options to minimize fraud on self service devices.   Admittedly, there are extra costs involved in taking precautions, and those will have to change over time as technology and fraud tactics adjust, but that’s really just part of doing business with self service, assisted service or any other consumer facing situation.    As with anything in life, it seems a shame to allow a few malcontents to ruin something that is helpful and useful to so many.

Unfortunately if you add in political posturing to this equation, it’s not terribly surprising that a government official will claim he’s protecting the public so that he can put a check mark of benefits he has provided to the voter on the mailer he gets Canada Post to send us every quarter.  That’s the game politicians have to play, but I find it surprising that any person who  walks around with a bank card, a credit card, or even a library card in his wallet can express his concern that he will not support a system that is not ‘foolproof’.  No system is completely foolproof by definition.  If you look at the comments from to the article in the Star, I don’t see any comments from people being concerned about their user data or financial data.  The comments revolve around their preferences for kiosks, people, or online, and some even make suggestions on how to fix the issue.

I used the kiosks for years and found them useful, but this year I changed over to their online service to get my new plate stickers and I found it very easy to use,  I had my stickers well before the renewal date, and I avoided lines as well as a trip to the mall.

That said, consumers increasingly expect to interface with organizations in the channel of their choosing.  I prefer online and mobile transactions, but my wife likes to transact with a real person.  I have friends who prefer the kiosk for whatever reason.

Today’s forward thinking organizations provide as many channels as are relevant and possible for consumers to ensure that they get all of the services they need.  That objective should not be limited to retail, banking or travel.  Government is a consumer facing body, and if they don’t offer the services consumers want, they will eventually face a consumer backlash or miss out on a potential cost savings or revenue benefit for their organization.

As far as the kiosks go, the implementation of a new network of kiosks is a huge investment.  With that behind them, it seems a shame that the government would just throw it all away in the name of security and savings.  Why not place the kiosks in ServiceOntario centres to reduce the load for overworked staff and to reduce the queue lengths?  The units are less likely to have security issues if staff are nearby and they could be made inaccessible after hours to further avoid tampering.

While the online option is terrific and probably growing, ask any one of the dozens of people in line at ServiceOntario sites if they would rather use a kiosk right now or wait 20 minutes to talk to a live person and see what they say.  In the end, it’s all about consumer choice, and removing a choice is a shame.

2012.30 | Passbook | Touch Wall | TipJar

iOS 6 Passbook - With the release of iOS 6 comes Passbook, and those of us in retail can start to see how pre-cursor to a mobile wallet really works.  As someone who uses tickets on my mobile for movies (Cineplex) and airlines (Air Canada, WestJet, United), this is an idea I can get behind.  I also have a bunch of loyalty cards I already use, some on my mobile, and some in my glove compartment

On the ticket side, I really look forward to avoiding screen caps, and then having my ticket autorotate as photos do when I turn my phone from portrait to landscape, or dim when I’ve been waiting too long.

I’m just updating my iPhone tonight, so I haven’t tested it on my own device.   Lots of keen users have already started posting their experiences.  There are a number of apps that are already Passbook CompatibleCineplex appears to be my sole option in Canada, and it’s sorta working.  It turns out you can also add passbook items to your passbook without an app passing the data via PassSource.

Let me know your experiences with Passbook.  I’ll be sharing mine.

Touch Wall – Looking for an entire wall of touchscreen LCDs so that you can blow your clients’ minds with interaction?  Engage Production in the UK has a new demo screen for clients that is composed of 24 linked 55 inch touch displays.  While there are some incredible things that can be done with a space of that magnitude, you have to wonder at all of the associated costs and how that can be used to drive business.  It’s difficult to come up with engaging content for any space let alone something so large!

It would be incredible to use this as a giant video wall display or split into screens with various types of media playing, and then allow customers to touch a spot anywhere on the display to initiate an individual screen usage area that could be defined by the application.

Now an interactive self service applications that is defined by the hardware in place has a great deal more flexibility.  Just turn on the app at the site, and give customers the option!

Customers could touch on an image of a shoe on the wall, and see a 360 degree representation they can manipulate.  Perhaps the system can have store staff  paged to bring a sample shoe to try for fit.  If the product is out of stock in their size, provide directions sent to their mobile on how to get to another store, or have the shoes shipped to their home.  If new products or ideas come up, change the apps and how clients interact.

TipJar - Seems like someone figured out one answer to my question about how we deal with
the age old tips problem in the age of electronic transactions.   The problem many of us have is that we never carry cash, but on the rare occasion where a cash tip is the only option, running to the ATM for $20 isn’t really a viable option.  Enter DipJar - a jar with an MSR built in.  If you want to tip someone, you dip your card in the MSR/Jar, and $1 is passed.  No more cash or someone stealing tips from the counter.  At the same time we can maintain the Funny Tip Jar tradition.

2012.24 | Retail Robots

Robotic Store Staff – Carnegie Mellon has developed a robot for retailers to assist in validating stock outs and misplaced items in the store.  The autonomous device rolls through the store on its own and scans the shelves to validate locations of items and notify staff via iPads.  They have augmented that solution with some additional technology – a Google Streetview like view of the store showing where products are located on a large format digital sign.   The sign is augmented with product information should customers wish to view it – even trailers of DVDs on the shelves if they are interested.

This is a very ambitious undertaking and that team should be commended for their initiative.  There are a few hurdles for this team I can see with this type of solution based on my experience in retail:

  • I don’t know how the system works as far as where the robot moves in the store.  If it isn’t bumping into walls like my Roomba, or if the Kinect can’t recognize obstacles, it probably has a map of the store in memory somewhere.  Updating store layouts and planograms is a lot of work, and generally where wayfinding falls down.  I’m sure it’s relatively straightforward in one CMU bookstore that probably doesn’t change out their mugs and sweatshirts too much in any given cycle.   Try this in a specialty or apparel chain across hundreds of sites with varying floor plans and the potential to move store fixtures, and it becomes much more challenging.  There would need to be a tool to accommodate tweaks at sites to administer this to validate that the store information.  The challenge will be around local versus remote administration.  Local staff know the store layout but are probably not technical enough to update the map on the robot.  Remote staff can update the robot but won’t know the store.    Even better, let the robot figure it out autonomously – that’s the ultimate.
  • The Google Streetview kiosk layout is very interesting, but once again, stores and merchandise are constantly updated.  I’m finding Google Streetview is already getting out of date – the stores on the street have changed since the images were taken.  I don’t always trust it now.  Same goes for a store.  The product changes, the store changes.  There needs to be a constant update mechanism.  Even if the product is shown in the right place on the Streetview interface, users will think that the view is different and become confused.  It’s the updates that kill solutions like this.
  • That User Interface on the digital sign had a lot going on.  I’m sure a great deal of thought went into it, and it looked great, but it has to be so easy that my mom can use it in front of a half dozen spectators with some product under her arm.  Keep what the solution does as simple as possible.  It’s not an app on a mobile device for users with time on their hands and lots of buttons to push.
  • Finding a product is more of an art than a science.  That’s why people are preferred to machines so far.  Describing product is harder than it sounds.  Examples on product search are always something easy like a CMU mug.  When a customer comes to search for something in the store, it could be a specific brand and easy to search on.  More often, it might be that lavender shirt with the grey buttons – do you have it in size 4?  While customers will walk up to a screen with no other options, they will prefer to deal with a real person.  It’s always easier to walk up to someone and ask.  Voice activated or image based search and validation would be terrific - ideally it could ask the customer some questions to narrow down the items and then show pictures of the product to validate what the customer is looking for, and then where it is in the store.  If not available, allow online order and ship.  Another option?  Let the robot provide directions to the product. If they could walk faster, having the robot lead there would be incredible.
  • iPad notifications are useful, but without followup, it doesn’t mean anything.  The solution should ensure that staff are notified and prompted to action.  If no update is made, then there should be automatic escalations to management.  Would also be great if the solution would indicate if product that should be on the shelf is in stock in the store or not.  The system could prompt re-ordering for outages.

All technology solutions have challenges. Tying the solutions into the operations without impacting store staff’s ability to get their jobs done is what will make or break any retail technology solution.   This is a very interesting idea with lots of potential.  I hope it gets built  out and there is interest from retailers.

Restaurant Robots – A restaurant in China has opened with robotic staff.  The robots actually usher in customers, cook food and serve.  They are also anthropomorphic and candy coloured to impress the children.  Given the cost of the robots, and the fact that this is likely not an automat – but requires human intervention, I would expect that the food is relatively expensive.  Biggest unanswered question – what do you tip a robot?

Robot Model for Fit – Purchasing clothing online can be convenient, but fit is always a factor.  Sizes can vary widely by clothing brand.  For those shopping for clothing online, the practice of purchasing a couple of sizes and just returning the ones that don’t fit at no charge has become common.  While a convenience to the shopper, it is a rising overhead cost for retailers.  In an attempt to reduce returns based on fit, fits.me, an Estonian company has developed a robot which can change its shape to fit clothing, and then provide measurements across thousands of points for each garment.  When a customer enters their measurements, and selects a garment, it shows how the item would fit their body.  This could allow online shoppers to have a better idea of how clothing will look and fit on their body – ideally reducing returns.

Android Salesperson/Actress - In order to push some extra sales for Valentine’s Day, Takishimiya’s Tokyo store turned to a real android.  Last February, an eerily realistic robot sat in a display case using her android phone and passing the time.   Straddling the line between mannequin and real life model, the robot reacts to its surroundings to provide lifelike responses to those around her.   While a novelty at present, you could see a hyper-realistic android catching on as a way to fully demonstrate products – show how easy it is to move and stretch in athletic apparel perhaps.

Other Important Retail Robots to Remember:

Kiva Systems – Amazon owned Inventory Picking Robot system – link from 2009 Post .

PAL robots – Used in Abu Dhabi Mall.

2012.08 | Interactive Screens – not Kiosks

Interactive kiosk solutions have been a part of retail for as long as someone was able to stick a computer in a box.  While mobile is definitely a phenomenon in retail, we are far from saturation on kiosks as self service solutions.   In fact, there has never been a better time to consider a self service kiosk solution – and those solutions don’t have to be limited to a little square screen on a stick.

The technology options available to power these solutions has improved tremendously and there are an increasingly wide range of form factors, as well as peripherals of all sorts to serve pretty much any market or need imaginable.    In fact, I would suggest that the use of the term kiosk is outdated.  It refers to that little square screen on a stick or in a box from a decade ago.

The days of a cobwebbed kiosk in the corner are gone, and new technology means a new generation of interaction in sites.  Consider technology and societal changes that make these new interactions possible:

Larger format screens – 50 and 60″ LCD devices are now available for the cost of a regular old 15″ solution from a number of  years ago.     This reduced cost makes it more affordable to implement a kiosk that has some visual appeal, lots of space for visual elements, and more easily blends into the customer experience in the store than the technology of years gone by. Projection options are also finding their way into the mainstream – meaning a whole new opportunity for engagement and new placements of interactive experiences.

Increased Use of Touch –  - increased availability of touch interfaces means more people are comfortable with them.  If you think back just a few years, there was far less use of touch interfaces.  The release of iDevices, touch on Blackberries and various tablets and eReaders means that a comfort level has grown that was not there before.  This increases the willingness and comfort of the average consumer to interface with a touch system.

Pervasive Technology – There is now a generation of young adults who have never lived without mobile phones or the internet.  Where for many years one saw customers saying they “don’t want to use that thing” or “I want to talk to a person”, there is a whole new generation of shoppers are hungry for different touchpoints and shopping experiences.

What works with interactive kiosk experiences?

With the technology to enable incredible interactive experiences in any place where stores can exist, it is important to consider what experience is being provided.  I have seen a number of interactive experiences requested over the years, and there are a few learnings I can pass on.

1.  Buy-in – If an interactive experience in a retail setting is going to work, then all stakeholders have to be invested in it. If executives, store management or store staff don’t believe in the solution then it will fail.    Any half-hearted solution will not work.  It is like any other group initiative.  Without the conscious involvement, understanding and enthusiasm from the team, whatever solution you have will not work.  It will be doomed from the start.

2. Functionality – The solution has to have a benefit to all who use it.  A benefit for the user, the store staff and the business in general.  For the customer it could be helping them avoid a line, or get help without having to ask a staff member.  For the store staff, it could help them with capacity. For the business, it can keep customers in the store instead of leaving, it could upsell them, it could give them an experience that will keep them as a long term customer.

As an additional detail, my experience has been that transactional systems tend to get more use than informational ones.  Where some customers may be interested in reading product information in great details, there is greater usage and more direct measurable benefit to the business when someone wants to buy something and can do so directly on the solution.

If customers can look at product information, that’s great, but if they can buy the product and have it sent to their home, they don’t need to consider a second interaction.  They can do it on the spot.   Bottom line in my opinion – no ROI – no interactive solution.  If it isn’t driving business, it’s taking up space.  Don’t implement technology for its own sake.

As a personal aside please don’t waste time with the following:

  • e-flyers – I’d like someone to show me how this pays off.  Why would I scroll through an e-flyer at a screen in a store?  I will do it at home, but that is a different user experience.  It is always faster to scan through a paper one in a store, users have no audience waiting to use the unit, and often the paper flyers are sitting in a giant pile right next to the screen.
  • games – I’ve never understood why I would want to play a game on a screen in a store or how that would benefit a retailer. I’m also annoying others who may want to use the screen to find a product.  Exception – if it’s a contest where I get a discount and it’s quick.
  • in store wayfinding – Nobody trusts these in stores anymore.  In a small store there is no need for them.  In a large store who keeps this updated?  Stores change around so much, and I doubt that planograms are updated and automatically interfaced.  It can also take longer to scroll through than just walk through the store.  Exception 1 – if there is an automated interface to constantly updated planogram system. Exception 2 – if there is a version that works with your mobile device Meijer Findit – maybe.  Just put stuff where we can find it.

Based on what I’ve seen, these items are add-ons designed to flesh out a solution, but it never feels useful or natural to me, and drives out more value more than it adds.

3.  User Experience – If the customer doesn’t at least find the experience useful, they won’t use the screen again.  I’m not a UI designer myself, but self service best practices should be followed that suit the application, and having an experienced consultant design your interface is well worth the investment.

Examples of best practices include using as few screens as possible to get a user to completion of their task, using buttons and text that are easy to see and read, and minimize and simplify data entry unless absolutely necessary – especially duplicate requests.  Providing a simple and convenient experience will draw them in and bring them back.

4.  Ongoing Support – If the solution isn’t working, it’s not getting used.  If it’s not getting used, the benefits above are not being realized.  If people see it not getting used, it will be used even less until it is completely ignored, negating the initial intention of having the solution at all.  Ongoing support means making sure the hardware is working to it’s full potential.  No failed peripherals, or a paper sign tacked on it saying out of order.  That can’t happen.

Just as importantly, content must be accurate and updated where relevant.  If a kiosk never changes, unless it fulfills a very specific and key function it will die.  Retailers would never consider leaving their stores the same through seasons – they are always updated with fresh ideas, programs and products.  Interactive solutions must be part of any store updates – the graphics, the videos, the interactions must all keep pace.  People are always engaged with new content – we all know this.  Make sure the solutions are constantly updated to pull people in.

This is a key element that gets missed.  Project teams move to the next new thing, funding is pulled to other new projects, and solutions die.  Don’t let that happen.

5.  One Brand Experience - Retailers understand that providing a seamless single experience to retailers across all parts of the business makes it easier for consumers to buy, which means more sales.  Now that barriers are being removed web stores and brick and mortar stores, allowing returns across the banner, for example, customers are expecting this barrier removal to continue across all interface points.  As each channel becomes easier to use, customers are likely to try out the new ones.  If a customer considers an interactive screen in a shopping centre to be a window into their brand experience, they are increasingly likely to use it.  It’s no longer a separate thing – using this interactive solution should be part a consistent brand  experience.  Try as much as possible to make that experience consistent and targeted to those consumers as much as possible.

This is by no means an exhaustive list, but these are key elements to making a solution really and truly work for the customers and the retailer.

Where is this going?

There is no way to know where the future takes us, but here are a few of my thoughts on the future of interactive screens – hitherto known as kiosks:

Every screen is interactive – and it should be.  Currently there is lots of digital signage out there, but the communication is only one way.  It is showing you messages and is not open for input.  The millennial cohort and younger generations are growing up with interactive screens.  Not having input doesn’t make sense to them.  Expect walls of digital posters in stores to be enabled for interactivity in the future.  During the slow hours of the day, they show brand and product messaging.  At busy times, they can be used to engage customers on selecting their best mobile plan, finding out their balance, or contacting a service rep.

Every interaction is personal - and it should be.  Future interactions should be filtered to get to the point for specific clients.  Allowing customers to identify themselves via loyalty cards or some other simple format means that the messaging and interactions can be customized.  This can minimize screens and touches and provide a streamlined experience.  It could mean language, recognizing services or products the customer has purchased or identified to provide assistance or upsell on them, offers specific to that customer, or even providing access to profiles so that customers can validate how they want to be dealt with.

Screens can be anywhere on any surface in any place.  Large screens are pervasive, but expect projection and other technologies to start to show up as cost drops and brightness increases.  They can cover large or irregular areas, they can provide big screen surface with a small device, and they provide flexible solution options. Starbucks had a good example of this in Toronto and Vancouver last year.

Screens will interact with each other.  Everyone knows we have screens in our pocket, but some content works better in a larger format.  It is technically possible to leverage both together in a store environment in myriad different ways.  Why not have a pre-ordering menu on a mobile device to stage an order that is passed to an in store device to order?  Why not provide a message that an order is ready to a mobile device while customers wait in the store?  Why not enable selection of items for purchase of out of stock items instore from the website, and then complete the payment transaction on the small mobile screen for privacy and security?  As the general public matures technically and they see benefits, these interactions will catch on.

Once again, I think the time has passed to call these interactive kiosks.  Mobile is huge for reatil. Tablets are huge for retail as well, and some think these persona devices signal the end of kiosks, but interactive screens in stores, shopping centres, or wherever you wish already are and will continue to play a tremendous role in the retail ecosystem.

2012.02 | Mobile Tickets @ Cineplex

Last weekend I went to see The Adventures of Tintin.  I took the opportunity to try out Cineplex’s new mobile ticketing solution as part of this experience.  At the outset I wasn’t sure if this was the sort of solution I would use over again, but I came away quite impressed, and I expect I will be obtaining tickets this way in the future.  I am constantly baffled by the queues at my local theatre at the traditional ticket line.  I’ve always bypassed them by using the self service kiosks that they have for tickets.  If I can go even further and avoid purchase while in the theatre, I’m glad to do so.

Cineplex has offered their Print, Skip, and Scan option for some time.  Under this program, customers visit the Cineplex website, pick the film and venue and then print their tickets at home.  The tickets each have barcode that can be scanned for entry.  I have been a user of this solution many times, but have found that often my family decides to see a movie on the spur of the moment.  Given the time it takes to print out the 4-5 pages of tickets on my slow home printer, it’s actually faster in this instance to go to the theatre and just use the self serve kiosk to order and print tickets.  This new mobile solution lets me get my tickets on the way to the theatre.

Here’s how it works:

  • Customers with an iPhone or iPad can buy tickets right on the mobile device.  The Cineplex app can be downloaded from the iTunes store.  (The app is also available for Android and Blackberry users)
  • On first use customers add their Scene Loyalty card number in the app so they get full credit for purchases.
  • Using the app, which has great Flixster like information on the films showing, customers select the film, venue, showtime and quantity of tickets.
  • Customers enter their credit card number to pay.
  • The app provides the option to either print tickets at home (tickets sent via email) or use one’s mobile device to pick them up at the theatre.  I chose to use my mobile device.
  • The tickets quickly become available under a tab at the right side of the app labelled ‘tickets’.  Upon clicking the tickets tab, all tickets available to the customer are displayed on the mobile device.  Each ticket transaction has an associated barcode that is displayed on the screen.
  • Upon arrival at the theatre, customers visit a dedicated, stylish and very plainly identified kiosk to print their tickets.
  • After indicating on the kiosk that ticket printing is requested.  Customers open the cineplex app, select the tickets for the film they wish to use, and present the resulting barcode on their mobile to the plainly labelled scanner/imager on the kiosk.
  • Tickets for each individual attendee print immediately.  Customers take these tickets to the Cineplex associate who scans it and customers are ready to watch their movie.

What’s great about this solution?

  • It provides yet another channel for Cineplex customers to use.  Great retail today is about customer choice.  Customers can now buy tickets in yet another way – one that is very interesting to a significant segment of the movie viewing public – and one that is sure to appeal to Millenials who are increasingly accustomed to purchasing goods and services on their mobile devices.  While a new channel is available, all the old ones are still there.  If customers want to line up and buy their tickets from a person they can do so.  If they want to use a self service kiosk, they can do so.  If they want to order online and print at home, they can do so.  If they want to order online or on their mobile and print at the theatre they can do so.
  • It’s simple and builds upon the principles of purchase via their other channels.  It uses the same purchase flow and probably same web services for online ticket purchases.  This makes it a simple transition for current users.
  • The kiosk interface is very simple and the solution doesn’t make you wait. It’s very responsive.

What can improve?

  • Purchasing on the mobile and entering a whole credit card makes for some small text and less than optimal user interface situations.  That is probably more a function of what you can do with a mobile website today, and given that this is an initial iteration, I’m sure this will improve.  I expect that could also be improved if customers were allowed to tie a credit card number to their scene account so no credit card number need be entered.
  • The kiosk was a bit hard to find – placed by the arcade area.  Given all of the other technology in the front of a theatre, I can see that this would be a challenging decision for both logistical (power, data, floorspace) and flow (queueing, so many screens at front of the theatre) reasons.  Once you find the area, it is very plainly labeled and easy to understand.  Also, once customers that wish to use a solution like this know where the kiosk is, it becomes a moot point, as it will be easy for them to find.

On the whole, a very well done implementation in my mind.   I find it useful, and I applaud Cineplex for making the effort to install a solution of this kind.  I look forward to the evolution of this solution.

2011.48 | iPad Table Ordering

While it’s been around for a number of years, interest in ordering food directly from the table has arisen again.  Here is one prototype that allows the table itself to act as the ordering screen.  We have had a food court conceptual solution that operates in a similar way using Microsoft Surface at the NCR demo center in Atlanta for some time.    It’s really very slick, but you have to wonder about the cost and complexity of filling a restaurant or even a mall food court with Microsoft Surface multi-touch units.

A  Buffalo Wild Wings restaurant has been piloting an ordering system for iPads for a month here in Mississauga that allows customers to order directly from the tables on iPads specifically deployed to the tables for that purpose. The solution is from Hubworks Interactive.   I visited the restaurant a month ago, but did not get seated at those tables to try out the system personally.  You can see the iPads sitting on the table in the background.  I like the concept, but a few thoughts come to mind:

  • The site is in here in Ontario.  In Canada, EMV is a requirement.  A pinpad is not visible on these devices.  Doesn’t that leave the restaurant on the hook if someone challenges the charge?  That is the general rule here.
  • How is the iPad secured so some nefarious soul can’t leave with it?  The iPad units I saw just sit on the table.  While they have a large pack on them to keep the battery charged and protect them, I didn’t see any securing of the solution. There was quite a large staff on hand, and that would defeat much of that potential but in a busy situation with 58 screens on the walls, and the proliferation of beer – some will probably walk.
  • I didn’t see a printer on the terminals, so doesn’t someone have to bring a receipt to the table anyway?  It makes it more convenient for clients to pay when they wish, but it doesn’t remove the effort of wait staff from bringing a receipt.  A paper receipt is required locally for debit and credit transactions.
  • Customers inevitably have some request that is not exactly as it appears on the menu.   (Soda water with extra lime, anyone?)  I assume that is handled by wait staff.
  • What about coupons for a free appetizer?  What about gift cards?  Are those accommodated?  Special offers and gift cards are a big part of the restaurant business.
  • Who is tasked with taking orders to the tables and validating that clients aren’t waiting too long?  When I asked about it at the restaurant, they indicated that the orders from the iPad ordering system are not identified any differently on the Kitchen Display system.  What is the influence on tipping when I entered my order on a terminal?  If it goes down will wait staff avoid those tables?
  • What is the care and feeding of such a solution from a technical perspective moving forward?  I’m not aware of much in the way of remote support tools for iOS units. The Hubworks Interactive website indicates that they use a cloud based solution which should minimize the management, but that work never goes away completely.  For example, these units have to be charged by someone at some point.  Cloud based solutions also mean that if the restaurant goes offline, those ordering units aren’t working.
  • How does the ROI work on these units?  The cheapest iPads are about $500. Add the cost of the case, software and ongoing support, and it must be at least $750-$1,000 per table.  While I can appreciate that there is a great deal of expense in a restaurant already with 58 televisions, the cost of putting iPads and an ordering solution at every table will add up.  There could definitely be a benefit of a perception of customer service, but is it worth it?

I applaud Hubworks Interactive for putting it together and Buffalo Wild Wings for trying something new.  Integrating new technologies into the grind of retail is always a challenge, and the only way to work out the kinks is to try it.  Time will tell if it works out.  I look forward to seeing how these fare in December 2012.

2011.39 | Retail Linkdump

Robots at the Mall – Everyone loves robots, and malls in Abu Dhabi may soon be leveraging robots as service ambassadors.  The humanoid robots built by Barcelona based PAL Robotics  have touch screens built into their chests, cameras in their heads to allow them to recognize users, and wheels to allow them to drive around.  Instead of printing a map to a location in a large mall or hospital, the robots can lead you there.  Make sure you watch the video.  Very iRobot.

No Branch Banking 2.0 – While there were a few Internet only banks floating around with the first Internet bubble, one still needed a card to get cash at some point.  With our new mobile reality, Movenbank is offering a cardless banking experience based on the web and Android NFC mobile devices.

Mobile Phone Recycler ATM – While I’ve heard of kiosks to recycle old technology in the past, ecoATM now sports a camera to identify your old mobile device so you can get a quote on the spot.  via PSFK

eBay Mobile Image Search – 2d Barcodes are too unwieldly for many – or so it seems.  How about taking a picture of something you like with your mobile phone camera, and having your mobile look for that item on sale on eBay based on the image?   eBay recently announced that the eBay mobile app will have this capability in the mobile app by the end of the year.

Ikea Happy to Bed Campaign – Ikea’s recent online campaign makes use of a fancy Youtube trick, an interface to Facebook, and some input from the user to provide a very personalized shopping experience.  Make sure you watch the whole video.  You are somehow convinced to build a shopping list without knowing what was happening.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 369 other followers

%d bloggers like this: