TRNK – Many of today’s successful retailers are really creative curators. TRNK represents a terrific example of the focus on curation in retail. In fact, visitors to the site may be unclear on whether they are visiting an online magazine, an online retailer, or a blog. The site portrays a particular style. If readers enjoy that style, they can bring that style into their own lives through buying products showcased. There are links to all sorts of home decoration elements and furniture – with all of the links pointing to a variety of retailers and even eBay for vintage items.
Sites like TRNK provide an interesting opportunity for retailers. Specialty retailers work incredibly hard to build their brands with their own sense of style to suit a certain segment, and may consider these sites a potential dilution of their brand. That said, the emergence of the online world has enabled an incredible number of different communities driven by different interests, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to market to all of them one by one. Embracing these lifestyle sites / marketplaces and their respective followers can provide retailers a resource to outsource the challenge of marketing to these increasingly diverse communities.
Specialty retailers would find it beneficial to enable these sites to showcase their products paired with those of other complimentary products. Shoe retailers find themselves challenged with pairing their shoes with entire outfits – a disadvantage from fashion retailers that are increasingly offering shoes for sale as well. As well as using their own resources to suggest the right ensemble for shoes, these retailers could point to these lifestyle sites so that their clients can see for themselves how the shoes will look paired with the outfits. Cultivating a network of these sorts of lifestyle sites as partners is basically a retailer version of the Amazon Associates program where participants can advertise products with a link to Amazon and get a cut of the sale. Why shouldn’t specialty retailers enable the same sort of programs – with more style – and expand their reach?
Pizza Hut Touchscreen Table – A concept video for a touchscreen table a la Microsoft Surface (Now PixelSense) was released by a Pizza Hut a couple of weeks ago. It has the requisite upbeat tunes, beautiful graphics and uncluttered and simple interfaces complete with paying with your phone just by having it on the table. It’s a great idea and really the extension of tablet ordering solutions like those employed at places like Buffalo Wild Wings. Of course, in real life the challenges are a little more complicated. From a logistical perspective:
- Tables are never completely clear of items in a restaurant as shown in the video (napkins, condiments, cutlery),
- This thing will get quite greasy at a Pizza place (looked at your tablet in the bright light of day recently? Add pizza and kids),
- Can you imagine fighting with your kids over who has control of this thing at any particular time and do we want to watch them play more games?,
- iPhones don’t have NFC, which would be the requirement for the payment element element to work as shown,
- How much more costly is this table than a regular table? what is the added value to the customer and to the company?,
- Is the system connected to the in-store inventory? How happy are clients when they finally configure their pizza and they are out of onions or whole wheat dough?
- How much work is it to change this when the menu changes?
- Isn’t it faster just to tell them what you want?
- How will people who can’t figure out how Netflix works make this work?
I love the concept. I would use it, but then, I’m a Netflix guru. It’s much easier to poke holes than it is to make these thing work, and I applaud the vision. My main concern is around flash over substance. Over half of the people in North America walk around with a computer in their pocket. Should we put another huge one into every table? I’m for it, but I’m not paying!